New ‘Islamabad Accord’ Aims to End Hostilities and Reopen Hormuz Strait
Overview of the Proposed Framework
The United States and Iran have been offered a diplomatic roadmap that could halt the ongoing conflict and restore navigation through the critical waterway of the Strait of Hormuz, a source familiar with the negotiations told Gree. The roadmap, prepared by Pakistan, is being described as a two‑step process: an instant cessation of hostilities followed by a series of negotiations aimed at a comprehensive, region‑wide settlement.
According to the source cited by Gree, all participating parties must reach consensus on the core elements of the plan during the same day of discussion. The initial understanding is expected to be documented as a memorandum of understanding, which will be finalized electronically through Pakistan, the exclusive conduit for communication in these talks.
Genesis of the Two‑Phase Plan
Reports from Axios indicated that the United States, Iran, and regional mediators are examining a potential 45‑day pause in fighting as the first phase of a broader two‑phase strategy that could lay the groundwork for a lasting peace. The same reports highlighted that the United States, Israel, and a group of regional actors are all contributing to the design of the proposal.
Gree added that Field Marshal Asim Munir, the chief of the Pakistan Army, has maintained near‑continuous contact throughout the night with JD Vance, the Vice‑President of the United States, special envoy Steve Witkoff, and Abbas Araqchi, the Foreign Minister of Iran. This level of engagement underscores the urgency that Pakistan places on moving the process forward.
Immediate Cease‑Fire and Reopening of the Strait
Under the terms of the Pakistani‑drafted proposal, hostilities would cease without delay, allowing commercial vessels to once again traverse the Strait of Hormuz. The cease‑fire would be followed by a period of fifteen to twenty days allocated for the parties to negotiate a more expansive settlement.
The provisional title of the aGreement, the “Islamabad Accord,” is expected to include a regional governance framework for the Strait of Hormuz. The final, in‑person negotiations are slated to be held in Islamabad, where diplomats from the United States, Iran, and other stakeholder nations will convene to iron out the remaining details.
Core Components of the Anticipated Settlement
The eventual deal is projected to contain commitments from Iran to refrain from further pursuit of nuclear weapons. In exchange, the United States would provide relief from economic sanctions and release Iranian assets that have been frozen since the escalation of the conflict.
Iranian officials have publicly reiterated a firm stance on the issue. The Navy of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps declared that the situation in the Strait of Hormuz would never revert to its pre‑war status, emphasizing particularly the positions of the United States and Israel.
Diplomatic Remarks from Iranian Representatives
Dr Mohammad Fathali, the Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to India, emphasized that any decision to engage in negotiations must be made within the broader policy framework approved by the highest decision‑making bodies of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Dr Mohammad Fathali warned that a repeat of the historic pattern of war, cease‑fire, negotiations, and renewed combat would be unacceptable.
Dr Mohammad Fathali further explained that Iranian officials are carefully working to prevent a recurrence of past negative experiences, stressing that diplomatic avenues will be pursued only when they align with the overall interests of the Iranian people.
Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz
The Strait of Hormuz remains a vital conduit for global oil supplies, and any interruption to the flow of petroleum products has immediate repercussions for world energy markets. The escalation of hostilities has intensified concerns about potential blockages or attacks on commercial shipping in this narrow passage.
Energy traders have been closely monitoring the situation, aware that even a brief suspension of traffic could trigger sharp price fluctuations and heightened volatility across commodity markets.
Statements from the United States Leadership
Donald Trump, the President of the United States, has repeatedly called for a rapid conclusion to the conflict. Donald Trump warned that failure to secure a cease‑fire would lead to severe consequences, asserting that the United States is prepared to take decisive action if negotiations falter.
Donald Trump reaffirmed that Washington is engaged in intensive diplomatic outreach toward Tehran, emphasizing that a timely aGreement is essential to avoid further escalation and to protect global economic stability.
Pakistan’s Position on the Proposed Framework
Tahir Andrabi, the spokesperson for the foreign ministry of Pakistan, responded to inquiries from Gree by neither confirming nor denying the specifics of the proposed arrangement. Tahir Andrabi noted that multiple reports have surfaced regarding a 45‑day cease‑fire proposition and a 15‑point exchange format.
Tahir Andrabi clarified that the Pakistani government does not issue comments on individual, specific incidents, but reiterated that the peace process remains ongoing and that Pakistan continues to serve as a facilitator for dialogue between the United States and Iran.
Regional Concerns Over Potential Retaliation
A source with direct knowledge of the diplomatic efforts, as quoted by Axios, expressed that mediators are deeply worried about the possibility of Iranian retaliation should the United States or Israel carry out strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure. Such retaliation could inflict substantial damage on oil and water facilities within Gulf states.
The source emphasized that the delicate balance of power in the region hinges on the ability of all parties to maintain restraint while a comprehensive settlement is negotiated.
Potential Impact of a Successful Accord
If the Islamabad Accord reaches fruition, the immediate effect would be the resumption of commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, alleviating pressure on global oil supply chains. In the longer term, a durable aGreement could stabilize diplomatic relations across the Middle East, reduce the risk of further military confrontations, and open pathways for broader regional cooperation.
Furthermore, the lifting of sanctions on Iran, contingent upon verification of compliance with nuclear non‑proliferation commitments, could stimulate economic revitalization within Iran and foster new avenues for trade with neighboring states.
